Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
Motivation:
Editor suggested a "consumer behavior"-journal which is code for "bad research" among consumer culture scholars. No reason why the paper did not fit was offered (also, the paper did not in any way discuss "behavior", but supplied criticism of core tenets in consumer culture theory/practice theory).
n/a
n/a
11 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
Motivation:
considered a quit decision.
19.6 weeks
28.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
Long review process but high quality of feedback
56.7 weeks
73.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
High quality but very long process.
19.3 weeks
27.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
Very constructive and useful reviews.
I was really impressed with this review-process.
The only drawback is that it took (in my opinion) too long when I received the first reviews.
I was really impressed with this review-process.
The only drawback is that it took (in my opinion) too long when I received the first reviews.