Reviews for "Journal of Computational Neuroscience"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Computational Neuroscience 11.0
weeks
13.9
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: A great journal, with a precise and almost rapid review process.
Journal of Computational Neuroscience 3.0
weeks
3.0
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Nothing more to say. All was very smooth and reasonable
Journal of Computational Neuroscience 8.1
weeks
8.1
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Motivation: -the revision duration was correct
-the reviewers arguments to reject the paper were acceptable
Journal of Computational Neuroscience 5.3
weeks
5.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: This was my first experience with double-blinded process. I have to say that it was a really positive experience for the obvious reason; I noticed that there was not bias at all in the process regarding our experience in the field. They evaluate only the submitted work.