Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.9 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2014
Motivation:
The review process was efficient and received comments relevant.
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
Motivation:
The editor suggested resubmitting the article to a journal from a slightly different subject area.