Reviews for "Journal of Common Market Studies"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Common Market Studies 7.1
weeks		 22.3
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: The first review round was a good experience: three high-quality reports which helped to improve my manuscript a lot. However, the send review round took a bit more time than I expected, probably due to the summer holiday. Overall, nice experience.
Journal of Common Market Studies 17.4
weeks		 19.4
weeks		 n/a 4 3
(good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: Overall this was a good experience, with the exception of the waiting times, which were a bit longer than expected. The editor was in general hands off (the ms was not in his field), but eventually helpful to deal with a particularly hostile reviewer.
Journal of Common Market Studies 9.1
weeks		 19.1
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: The overall process was incredibly quick and smooth, plus the editors were very transparent about all steps and what they expect in R&R.
Journal of Common Market Studies 13.1
weeks		 13.1
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 3
(good)		 Rejected
Motivation: Critical but not unfair reviews. The main comments could have been met with "major revisions"
Journal of Common Market Studies 7.6
weeks		 7.6
weeks		 n/a 2 3
(good)		 5
(excellent)		 Rejected
Motivation: Very responsive.
Journal of Common Market Studies 7.7
weeks		 7.7
weeks		 n/a 2 2
(moderate)		 3
(good)		 Rejected
Motivation: We are very satisfied about the contact with the editorial office, as well as with the speed of the process. The reviewer reports, however, were less informative, as the comments suggested that they did not read the paper in detail.
Journal of Common Market Studies 13.0
weeks		 14.0
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Journal of Common Market Studies 9.6
weeks		 15.4
weeks		 n/a 3 3
(good)		 3
(good)		 Accepted
Motivation: I feel this a generally positive experience. The turnaround time was decent. There were one or two comments that I felt stemmed from not having read the MS carefully, but overall the comments were well-observed and helped me to improve the manuscript a great deal. They were quite strict on the word count.