Reviews for "Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.3 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Rejected
2020
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation: Very quick response, encouraging us to pursue a more fitting journal for our paper
13.6 weeks
13.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
2
Rejected
2013
9.3 weeks
32.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Rejected
2015
Motivation: The entire process took a long time and I wish the journal had rejected it sooner, rather than having me go through two rounds of revisions prior to ultimately rejecting it. Also, one of the reviewers thoughts it was fine as is, whereas one of the revisions had only a couple of sticking points. It seemed like the small issues that ultimately led to the paper being rejected were too minor for outright rejection.