Reviews for "Journal of Chemical Physics"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Chemical Physics 8.1
weeks
8.7
weeks
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
2
(moderate)
Accepted
Motivation: We got a single short review asking us to shorten the manuscript and write a more focused discussion. It was clear that the reviewer had not read the paper in detail. For example, he/she identified several points made in the manuscript as being interesting. Half of these were actually just citing/explaining/discussing other people's work. Overall it was a very poor review. We resubmitting after shortening the manuscript by about 10% and the editor accepted it without further review.
Journal of Chemical Physics 4.9
weeks
9.1
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The reviewers made useful comments. One recommended a minor revision and the other a rejection. The editor asked us to re-submit the paper. In the end, one of the reviewers disagreed with a couple of our claims in the manuscript but he was OK with it being published. I was very happy with the editor and reviewers overall.
Journal of Chemical Physics 5.0
weeks
5.1
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Journal of Chemical Physics 5.3
weeks
7.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The editor was extremely efficient and professional.
The review process was quick.
Journal of Chemical Physics 8.7
weeks
9.1
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Reviewing process was handle quickly and carefully.