Reviews for "Journal of Biological Rhythms"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.9 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2015
Motivation: The reviewers comments with thoughtful, positive, and helpful for revision. The editor liked the topic of the paper and felt its findings were important. Overall it was a positive experience.