Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.6 weeks
7.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
Although the editor rejected our paper, we received a quite positive letter from her. The problem mostly lied in that our paper was not interesting enough and the editor had an idea of that before sending the paper for peer review. However she acted professionally and based her final judgement at least partly on one of the reviews.