Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.3 weeks
3.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
As a broad topic journal, it is sometimes difficult to understand the exact scope of what constitutes applied physics versus something else. Their website on this question was not very helpful. However, they are excellent in terms of keeping the authors informed every step of the way.
4.0 weeks
4.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
Immediately accepted after 16.9 weeks
Accepted (im.)
2019
Motivation:
No further comments. Excelent peer-review process.
3.6 weeks
6.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
O editor tentou me vender várias vezes o serviço de correção gramatical da editora.
Immediately accepted after 0.4 weeks
Accepted (im.)
2013
Motivation:
After a thorough review process at APL, paper was accepted without external review. A very quick review by an associate editor was all that was required prior to acceptance.
5.4 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Fast review process, high quality review, constructive comments and criticism of the referees
17.4 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2012