Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.6 weeks
6.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
Excellent review process, fast reviews, constructive reviews that improved the manuscript. Recommend journal for papers in the field of phycology.
5.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
The review comments was very informative and useful.
30.4 weeks
30.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
The review process were too long and bad. After 7 month, my manuscript was rejected. It took long too much and the reviewers' comment were not very scientific.
4.3 weeks
5.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
I think the review process was adequate and fast enough. I consider the process was appropriate and well managed.