Reviews for "Journal of Applied Economics"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Applied Economics 56.7
n/a 2 5
(very good)
Motivation: The review process was swift enough, although in general my impression was that the referees addressed those points that I never made in my paper. Yet, I had to respond in a way as if I had made these points in order not to get a rejection.
Journal of Applied Economics n/a n/a 7.0
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The submission process was not automated (November 2016; submission is via email). This may prove to be problematic; submissions may get lost, it is difficult to keep track of things, etc. However, I experienced no problems. Actually, the editorial office was very responsive and provided me considerable information on how the process was to proceed.