Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
27 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
Rejected in 1 week after urging
56.7 weeks
69.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
The review process was swift enough, although in general my impression was that the referees addressed those points that I never made in my paper. Yet, I had to respond in a way as if I had made these points in order not to get a rejection.
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
The submission process was not automated (November 2016; submission is via email). This may prove to be problematic; submissions may get lost, it is difficult to keep track of things, etc. However, I experienced no problems. Actually, the editorial office was very responsive and provided me considerable information on how the process was to proceed.