Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2020
Motivation:
The editor was quick to find reviewers with expertise in my field. The reviewers were overall professional and actually fair with their review. Although they recommended rejection on methodological grounds, their feedback improved my manuscript.
7.3 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
The review process went generally smoothly with this journal.
9.4 weeks
9.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
The editor answered very fast (on Sundays!) after the first submission. Reviewers' comments were helpful and the revised article was accepted within 3 days (at Christmas time, on Dec 25th!). I would recommend this journal.