Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
14.6 weeks
14.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2014
14.3 weeks
18.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The manuscript got some delay as the journal had difficulties finding reviewers. However, they always kept me up to date on the progress, which was very much appreciated.
10.8 weeks
18.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
The manuscript was handled rather quick. Only the final decision (after minor revisions) took a while. The comments given were usefull and relevant. The journal stresses the importance of correct use of English language and formatting (they even requested to consult external editing service), although the document with guidelines is not very complete and written in a clear way.