Reviews for "Journal of Agricultural Science"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Journal of Agricultural Science | 14.6 weeks |
14.6 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 2 (moderate) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
| Journal of Agricultural Science | 14.3 weeks |
18.4 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: The manuscript got some delay as the journal had difficulties finding reviewers. However, they always kept me up to date on the progress, which was very much appreciated. | |||||||
| Journal of Agricultural Science | 10.8 weeks |
18.4 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: The manuscript was handled rather quick. Only the final decision (after minor revisions) took a while. The comments given were usefull and relevant. The journal stresses the importance of correct use of English language and formatting (they even requested to consult external editing service), although the document with guidelines is not very complete and written in a clear way. | |||||||
@scirev