Reviews for "Journal of Adult Development"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
40.1 weeks	40.1 weeks	n/a	1	5 (excellent)	1 (bad)	Accepted	2016
Motivation: It was six weeks before the editor sent the paper out for review. Eight months later, I still did not have a decision. None of my inquiries received a response. Finally, I wrote and said that I intended to withdraw my paper if I did not hear anything within a week. Days later I received an acceptance.