Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Motivation: It took us quite a long time to receive initial response, but than the process was quick. The reviewer's comments were useful and helped us to improved the manuscript.
Motivation: The editorial team had a professional and honest attitude. Judging by their reviews, the selected reviewers were well versed in the field of submitted research and provided quality comments and suggestions for improvement. Technical support was quick to respond and effective. Overall, the publishing process was a pleasant experience.