Reviews for "Journal for Nature Conservation"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal for Nature Conservation 28.4
weeks		 30.6
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: It took us quite a long time to receive initial response, but than the process was quick. The reviewer's comments were useful and helped us to improved the manuscript.
Journal for Nature Conservation 9.0
weeks		 10.9
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: The editorial team had a professional and honest attitude. Judging by their reviews, the selected reviewers were well versed in the field of submitted research and provided quality comments and suggestions for improvement. Technical support was quick to respond and effective. Overall, the publishing process was a pleasant experience.