Follow @scirev on Twitter
Reviews for "Journal for Nature Conservation"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Journal for Nature Conservation | 9.0 weeks |
10.9 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: The editorial team had a professional and honest attitude. Judging by their reviews, the selected reviewers were well versed in the field of submitted research and provided quality comments and suggestions for improvement. Technical support was quick to respond and effective. Overall, the publishing process was a pleasant experience. | |||||||