Reviews for "ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4.0
weeks
5.4
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: My experience with this journal was really the worst. Non-ethical with the authors.
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 1.4
weeks
2.6
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Accepted
Motivation: The journal provided two superficial reviews below any standard. The first one was only a paragraph long. However, it contained one pertinent comment which wouldn't be possible to notice without carefully reading the manuscript, so my guess is that the reviewer did actually read the paper but didn't bother to comment. The second review was a non-review: it didn't contain a single word (empty text). Not a serious journal.
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4.7
weeks
5.6
weeks
n/a 3 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Accepted
Motivation: Fast processing time, but rather poor quality reviews. We only received superficial comments that only marginally improved the contents of the paper.