Reviews for "ISME Journal"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| ISME Journal | 6.3 weeks |
14.7 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: In the first round of reviews, I felt that the reviewers and editor put quite a bit of effort into providing really thorough reviews and I feel that my revisions, which required reanalyzing data, did improve the paper, but then they rejected it for lack of novelty. I just feel that if that is what they are going to judge a manuscript on, they should not invite a resubmit - that was irresponsible. | |||||||
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 35.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| ISME Journal | 19.6 weeks |
19.6 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 4 (very good) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected |
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 5.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Motivation: The decision was based on the manuscript not being fit for the journal. The editor gave good reasons for this decision, even though he praised the quality of the study, | |||||||
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 16.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 3.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| ISME Journal | 7.4 weeks |
14.9 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
| ISME Journal | 12.6 weeks |
15.9 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| ISME Journal | 11.4 weeks |
12.4 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: I wasn't satisfied with proofing process after my manuscript was accepted. | |||||||
@scirev