Reviews for "ISME Journal"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
ISME Journal 6.3
weeks
14.7
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: In the first round of reviews, I felt that the reviewers and editor put quite a bit of effort into providing really thorough reviews and I feel that my revisions, which required reanalyzing data, did improve the paper, but then they rejected it for lack of novelty. I just feel that if that is what they are going to judge a manuscript on, they should not invite a resubmit - that was irresponsible.
ISME Journal n/a n/a 35.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
ISME Journal 19.6
weeks
19.6
weeks
n/a 4 4
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
ISME Journal n/a n/a 5.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The decision was based on the manuscript not being fit for the journal. The editor gave good reasons for this decision, even though he praised the quality of the study,
ISME Journal n/a n/a 16.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
ISME Journal n/a n/a 3.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
ISME Journal 7.4
weeks
14.9
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted
ISME Journal 12.6
weeks
15.9
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted
ISME Journal 11.4
weeks
12.4
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted
Motivation: I wasn't satisfied with proofing process after my manuscript was accepted.