Reviews for "ISME Journal"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
ISME Journal n/a n/a 17.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
ISME Journal n/a n/a 5.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2020
Motivation: they stated our paper is not quite related to their journal topic, although the journal do publish many papers on this topic. this is ridiculous
ISME Journal n/a n/a 21.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
ISME Journal 6.3
weeks		 14.7
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 2
(moderate)		 Rejected 2019
Motivation: In the first round of reviews, I felt that the reviewers and editor put quite a bit of effort into providing really thorough reviews and I feel that my revisions, which required reanalyzing data, did improve the paper, but then they rejected it for lack of novelty. I just feel that if that is what they are going to judge a manuscript on, they should not invite a resubmit - that was irresponsible.
ISME Journal n/a n/a 35.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
ISME Journal 19.6
weeks		 19.6
weeks		 n/a 4 4
(very good)		 2
(moderate)		 Rejected 2018
ISME Journal n/a n/a 5.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Motivation: The decision was based on the manuscript not being fit for the journal. The editor gave good reasons for this decision, even though he praised the quality of the study,
ISME Journal n/a n/a 16.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
ISME Journal n/a n/a 3.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
ISME Journal 7.4
weeks		 14.9
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 3
(good)		 Accepted 2016
ISME Journal 12.6
weeks		 15.9
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted 2014
ISME Journal 11.4
weeks		 12.4
weeks		 n/a 3 3
(good)		 2
(moderate)		 Accepted 2012
Motivation: I wasn't satisfied with proofing process after my manuscript was accepted.