Follow @scirev on Twitter
Reviews for "ISME Journal"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome | Year |
| ISME Journal | 15.4 weeks |
22.3 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected | 2021 |
| ISME Journal | 15.0 weeks |
15.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 2 (moderate) |
1 (bad) |
Drawn back | 2018 |
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 17.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2019 |
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 5.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2020 |
| Motivation: they stated our paper is not quite related to their journal topic, although the journal do publish many papers on this topic. this is ridiculous | ||||||||
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 21.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2019 |
| ISME Journal | 6.3 weeks |
14.7 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected | 2019 |
| Motivation: In the first round of reviews, I felt that the reviewers and editor put quite a bit of effort into providing really thorough reviews and I feel that my revisions, which required reanalyzing data, did improve the paper, but then they rejected it for lack of novelty. I just feel that if that is what they are going to judge a manuscript on, they should not invite a resubmit - that was irresponsible. | ||||||||
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 35.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2019 |
| ISME Journal | 19.6 weeks |
19.6 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 4 (very good) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected | 2018 |
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 5.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2017 |
| Motivation: The decision was based on the manuscript not being fit for the journal. The editor gave good reasons for this decision, even though he praised the quality of the study, | ||||||||
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 16.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2017 |
| ISME Journal | n/a | n/a | 3.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2015 |
| ISME Journal | 7.4 weeks |
14.9 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted | 2016 |
| ISME Journal | 12.6 weeks |
15.9 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted | 2014 |
| ISME Journal | 11.4 weeks |
12.4 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted | 2012 |
| Motivation: I wasn't satisfied with proofing process after my manuscript was accepted. | ||||||||