Reviews for "iScience"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
iScience | n/a | n/a | 7.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: We received a notification about rejecting the manuscript from the editor on April 5, due to the manuscript does not fit editorial criteria. | |||||||
iScience | 5.1 weeks |
5.1 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Our manuscript was rejected at Cell Reports, due to a clearly unreasonable reviewer. The Cell Reports editor communicated with the iScience editor and encouraged us to send the manuscript there. We did so, and the iScience editor find one more reviewer to review our revisions (for the comments raised by the Cell Reports reviewers). It was accepted quickly | |||||||
iScience | 10.1 weeks |
15.6 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Reviewers were nice and knowledgble but a bit slow. 10 weeks for first round, 5 weeks for second. | |||||||
iScience | 4.0 weeks |
4.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 2 (moderate) |
3 (good) |
Drawn back |
iScience | 5.0 weeks |
5.1 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Detailed and highly demanding comments from reviewers. |