Reviews for "ISA Transactions"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
ISA Transactions	95.5 weeks	95.5 weeks	n/a	4	1 (bad)	0 (very bad)	Rejected
ISA Transactions	Motivation: This was the worst submission I have ever had. This is unbearable for a PhD student to waste 22 month for such an irregular journal. ِDuring this time, the editor was saying that he needs 1 additional review to make the decision.
ISA Transactions	14.1 weeks	21.1 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
ISA Transactions	Motivation: The reviewers were very objective in their reviews (major revision) and highlighted the critical issues with the paper. After resubmission, the paper was accepted without any further hurdle. The reviewers were less critical as I had uploaded videos of experimental results.
ISA Transactions	5.9 weeks	49.1 weeks	n/a	3	5 (excellent)	5 (excellent)	Accepted
ISA Transactions	10.0 weeks	10.0 weeks	n/a	3	2 (moderate)	2 (moderate)	Rejected
ISA Transactions	9.9 weeks	9.9 weeks	n/a	4	0 (very bad)	2 (moderate)	Rejected
ISA Transactions	15.4 weeks	15.4 weeks	n/a	2	0 (very bad)	0 (very bad)	Rejected
ISA Transactions	Motivation: The paper has been submitted to reviewers and I received only comments from one reviewer and the comments of the editor. The editor decide to reject the paper for the following reason: 'This is not one of the application focuses of ISA Trans. There are number of journals in this area, as listed in References in the paper. The authors may consider to submit the paper to one of these journals'. -Why they take more than three months to tell me that the paper is outside of the scope of the journal.