Reviews for "ISA Transactions"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
ISA Transactions 14.1
weeks
21.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The reviewers were very objective in their reviews (major revision) and highlighted the critical issues with the paper. After resubmission, the paper was accepted without any further hurdle. The reviewers were less critical as I had uploaded videos of experimental results.
ISA Transactions 5.9
weeks
49.1
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
ISA Transactions 10.0
weeks
10.0
weeks
n/a 3 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
ISA Transactions 9.9
weeks
9.9
weeks
n/a 4 0
(very bad)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
ISA Transactions 15.4
weeks
15.4
weeks
n/a 2 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The paper has been submitted to reviewers and I received only comments from one reviewer and the comments of the editor. The editor decide to reject the paper for the following reason: 'This is not one of the application focuses of ISA Trans. There are number of journals in this area, as listed in References in the paper. The authors may consider to submit the paper to one of these journals'.

-Why they take more than three months to tell me that the paper is outside of the scope of the journal.