Reviews for "Inverse Problems"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Inverse Problems n/a n/a 107.0
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The editorial board member completely missed the point in the paper. The journal also did not reveal the name of the editorial board member. Even though it was not sent for external review, the journal did not provide any name of a person who had handled the paper, except for the secretarial assistant who manages the emails. Why it took almost 4 months for a non-review is another question.