Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Motivation: This journal has high standards for the quality of the paper. The remarks from the reviewers were relevant. Thanks to their constructive remarks, there was an big improvement of the manuscript. To my experience, I recommend totally this journal and hope they will maintain their standards.
Motivation: After the second round, the decision was "reject and resubmit". Then the reviewers have been changed and I received the new reports. Since the reviewers were not the same, the points suggested by the new reviewers are completely different.