Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
21 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2024
Motivation:
A short paragraph explaining why the manuscript was not a good fit for the journal and some suggestions about what kind of journal might be more suitable.
17.1 weeks
17.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2020
Motivation:
One of the reviewer reports was around 200 words and it was not helpful at all. The other was a bit more detailed but it was not worth waiting for 4 months. One expects some constructive comments after waiting that long. I would not send another manuscript there.
26.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2013
Motivation:
Reviewers were favorable in recommending publication (one accept and one suggested a couple of revisions), but the editors rejected it anyway, with no opportunity to revise. Plus, the 6 month review time was unprofessional.