Reviews for "International Mathematics Research Notices"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
International Mathematics Research Notices 31.9
weeks
31.9
weeks
n/a 2 0
(very bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: One of the reviewers did not read the paper beyond the introduction and did not understand the motivation of the paper at all. He/she also made a handful of mathematically wrong statements. The other reviewer clearly read the paper and made a list of editorial corrections.Main purpose of the paper was also lost on him/her.
International Mathematics Research Notices 16.1
weeks
16.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
International Mathematics Research Notices 10.6
weeks
12.3
weeks
n/a 1 2
(moderate)
4
(very good)
Accepted
International Mathematics Research Notices 26.0
weeks
26.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: After 6 months we got two reviews saying that the paper is very good, but both proposed to reject it as too specialized
International Mathematics Research Notices 20.6
weeks
20.6
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
International Mathematics Research Notices 8.7
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Our manuscript was handled within 3 months which in my experience is quite fast.
International Mathematics Research Notices 15.0
weeks
15.0
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Very efficient and very accurate referee report
International Mathematics Research Notices 12.7
weeks
12.7
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 4
(very good)
Accepted