Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
23.9 weeks
23.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
One referee suggests accepting with very positive comments, while the other suggests rejecting because we did not cite one reference which is actually not relevant to our study.
31.9 weeks
31.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2017
Motivation:
One of the reviewers did not read the paper beyond the introduction and did not understand the motivation of the paper at all. He/she also made a handful of mathematically wrong statements. The other reviewer clearly read the paper and made a list of editorial corrections.Main purpose of the paper was also lost on him/her.
16.1 weeks
16.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2018
10.6 weeks
12.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2015
26.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
After 6 months we got two reviews saying that the paper is very good, but both proposed to reject it as too specialized
20.6 weeks
20.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2015
8.7 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
Our manuscript was handled within 3 months which in my experience is quite fast.
15.0 weeks
15.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
Very efficient and very accurate referee report
12.7 weeks
12.7 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
Accepted
2013