Reviews for "International Journal of Thermal Sciences"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
International Journal of Thermal Sciences 8.7
weeks
15.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: The processing time was very long, although I could track the overall progress using the new Elsevier tracking tool. Most of the 'Review' time was spent on Reviewer #2 who did not seem very interested in this paper. That Reviewer submitted one short comment following the first round of reviews stating that they didn't believe the problem was posed correctly but presented no evidence. However, Reviewer #1, obviously an expert in this field, was very thorough and considerate and suggested useful additions to the manuscript. I waited for about 1.5 months before the Editor communicated their final decision to me but no reviewer comments came through, it was just an 'accept' letter.
International Journal of Thermal Sciences 59.0
weeks
62.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted
Motivation: the reviewers complains about the length of the article. No precise comments on the content.
International Journal of Thermal Sciences 11.3
weeks
17.3
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted
International Journal of Thermal Sciences 34.7
weeks
34.7
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted