Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.7 weeks
15.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
The processing time was very long, although I could track the overall progress using the new Elsevier tracking tool. Most of the 'Review' time was spent on Reviewer #2 who did not seem very interested in this paper. That Reviewer submitted one short comment following the first round of reviews stating that they didn't believe the problem was posed correctly but presented no evidence. However, Reviewer #1, obviously an expert in this field, was very thorough and considerate and suggested useful additions to the manuscript. I waited for about 1.5 months before the Editor communicated their final decision to me but no reviewer comments came through, it was just an 'accept' letter.
59.0 weeks
62.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
the reviewers complains about the length of the article. No precise comments on the content.
11.3 weeks
17.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2019
34.7 weeks
34.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013