Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
5 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
The first round of the review process was done very quickly and in high-quality.
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
There was only one review report after 3 months.
No comments from the editor.
The review report completely missed the category of the submitted article and provided wrong judgement. The editor was not the same specialty.
to summarize, very bad review process, while the article was accepted afterwards by another journal.
No comments from the editor.
The review report completely missed the category of the submitted article and provided wrong judgement. The editor was not the same specialty.
to summarize, very bad review process, while the article was accepted afterwards by another journal.
21.7 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
The review process for this journal was extremely long and one of the longest I ever experienced.
After such long period, the article was rejected by opinion of 2 reviewers which all together included a total of 5 sentences.
One reviewer even suggested revision of the article and provided some compliments.
But the other reviewer has copy-pasted limitations of the study and, even more, rejected on the basis that part of the study was not demonstrated - which was actually presented in both Tables and Text!
Finally, the editor who rejected the article is coming from another specialty and completely different area of expertise.
In summary, I am not considering this journal for future submissions anymore, while before impact factor went up - it was completely different experience.
After such long period, the article was rejected by opinion of 2 reviewers which all together included a total of 5 sentences.
One reviewer even suggested revision of the article and provided some compliments.
But the other reviewer has copy-pasted limitations of the study and, even more, rejected on the basis that part of the study was not demonstrated - which was actually presented in both Tables and Text!
Finally, the editor who rejected the article is coming from another specialty and completely different area of expertise.
In summary, I am not considering this journal for future submissions anymore, while before impact factor went up - it was completely different experience.
17.4 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2021