Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
15.9 weeks
15.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
The submission was quickly handled and two reviewers were quick to accept invitations of reviewing. The paper itself suffers from major problems in technical aspects, and lacks novel contribution, as acknoledged by the reviewer team, and I completely agree. The review reports are of high quality, harsh but fair, and I really benefited from them a lot, as they gave constructive criticism that actually help me find a new direction where I can better frame this research.
It was a long shot anyway, and I really appreciate that they took the effort and reviewed my paper.
It was a long shot anyway, and I really appreciate that they took the effort and reviewed my paper.
n/a
n/a
29 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
The editorial assessment seems relevant. Wil update manuscript for raised concerns and resubmit.
4.4 weeks
5.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
3.0 weeks
4.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted