Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
The editor decided to reject the manuscript without sending to further review. He argued that, even though our manuscript was within the journal's scope, the journal receives many more submissions yearly than it can actually publish. Because of that, he has to balance the kind of content that do make it through reviewing. His decision was not driven by the submission's quality.
n/a
n/a
29 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
No reason was given for why it took four weeks to reject without sending to any reviewers. The manuscript was a good fit for the journal. Upon submission to a comparable journal, it was reviewed with minor edits and accepted for publication within a month.