Reviews for "International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a 3 4
(very good)
(very good)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: The reviewer's suggestions mostly contributed to the manuscript and the most important was that the editor gave a chance to correct. I had similar remarks regarding my paper at another journal and the editor did not give any chance to correct. Based on my experience with Prof. Palermo, he gives a chance to address the remarks, even they seems very complicated.