Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.3 weeks
4.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2019
Motivation:
Only single comment by the Reviewer-1 was given which is: "Please edit Table 2 and 3. ". However, Reviewer-2 said, "Main contributions of the paper is not clearly addressed throughout the paper".
The associate editor said, "The contribution of this work is only marginal with respect to other previously published works. " and rejected the paper.
The associate editor said, "The contribution of this work is only marginal with respect to other previously published works. " and rejected the paper.
12.4 weeks
12.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
Both the reviewers said the paper has limited novelty without going into the technicality of the paper. I'm totally unsatisfied with the comments