Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.9 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2022
n/a
n/a
12 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Motivation:
Very minimal explanation just saying the article was uninteresting for them.
27.1 weeks
27.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
The reviews came after 6 months of wait and several emails of reminders sent to the editor.
21.4 weeks
21.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Although the review process took quite some time, I was still satisfied with how the manuscript was handeled. I received two reviewer comments as well as an editorial comment which in my opinion, were helpful for improving my manuscript. You could sense that the reviewers thoroughly read the manuscript as the minor revisions encompassed not only the lay-out but also, for example, some critical comments regarding the methodology.
Much appreciated was the postponement of the resubmission deadline due to a holiday of the first author.
Much appreciated was the postponement of the resubmission deadline due to a holiday of the first author.
21.7 weeks
22.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
The review comments were good.
The editorial process was fast
The editorial process was fast