Reviews for "International Journal of Medical Informatics"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
International Journal of Medical Informatics | n/a | n/a | 12.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Very minimal explanation just saying the article was uninteresting for them. | |||||||
International Journal of Medical Informatics | 27.1 weeks |
27.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 1 (bad) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The reviews came after 6 months of wait and several emails of reminders sent to the editor. | |||||||
International Journal of Medical Informatics | 21.4 weeks |
21.9 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Although the review process took quite some time, I was still satisfied with how the manuscript was handeled. I received two reviewer comments as well as an editorial comment which in my opinion, were helpful for improving my manuscript. You could sense that the reviewers thoroughly read the manuscript as the minor revisions encompassed not only the lay-out but also, for example, some critical comments regarding the methodology. Much appreciated was the postponement of the resubmission deadline due to a holiday of the first author. |
|||||||
International Journal of Medical Informatics | 21.7 weeks |
22.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The review comments were good. The editorial process was fast |