Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
20.0 weeks
20.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
2
Rejected
2019
Motivation: The first reviewer sent less than a line as a response. The second one, although a little more helpful, was rude. I understand my article would not be accepted due to the lack of quality, however, I expected more professional reviewers and editors. Moreover, I could not have an answer to my article from the Editor during the process.
8.4 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2016
9.1 weeks
21.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2016
7.0 weeks
8.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2012
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
5
5
Accepted
2014