Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
19.4 weeks
21.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2025
Motivation:
The review process took a bit longer than expected, but I noticed that the recruitment of suitable reviewers caused the delay. Once the invitations were accepted, the reviewing time was quite reasonable. The first round of reviews was thorough and accurate, although one reviewer's comments felt uncomfortable. In the second round, this reviewer mentioned that, in hindsight, he realized his comments were a bit harsh. Overall, the reviewing process improved the paper and pointed out subtle issues.