Reviews for "International Journal of Intercultural Relations"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
19.4
weeks
32.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: Good choice of reviewers. Good comments of the reviewers. But the process took too much time.
27.1
weeks
38.1
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: Reviews were useful and relevant, and the editor was supportive. However, both the first (seven months) and the second (two months and a half) editorial decisions took too long.
10.7
weeks
10.7
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2016
Motivation: Although the manuscript was rejected, the reviews were very helpful and the handling time was reasonable.
9.3
weeks
27.7
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2015
19.7
weeks
22.4
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
3
(good)
Accepted 2015
35.9
weeks
50.1
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
3
(good)
Accepted 2014
Motivation: I believe the reviewers' comments were constructive in improving the quality of my manuscript. However, the whole process, especially the first round of review took too long. I was glad that they hurried up to publish it by the end of the year, though.
21.7
weeks
82.5
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted 2013