Submit review Create journal list

Reviews for "International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 7.6
weeks		 7.6
weeks		 n/a 2 3
(good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: very positive and constructive comments were addressed by one reviewer. The second reviewer was very concise.
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 18.0
weeks		 20.0
weeks		 n/a 2 3
(good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: the reviewers had constructive remarks. However, the manuscript was too long with too many details on the numerical method and its validation. To my point of view, it was not justified to reduce the length of the manuscript since it was a complete work useful for other researchers.
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer n/a n/a 4.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2.7
weeks		 3.0
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer n/a n/a 0.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: While negative, the answer was very quick.
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 6.0
weeks		 8.0
weeks		 n/a 3 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 71.9
weeks		 71.9
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: The process of reviewing is long and you should know that before submission due to high volume of papers submitted to this reputable journal
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 13.0
weeks		 13.1
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 0.1
weeks		 6.1
weeks		 n/a 2 3
(good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: Online publishing system for sending a little messy. The editor replied quickly. One of the reviewers did not respond for a long time, although his comments related only to the style of the text.