Reviews for "International Journal of Geographical Information Science"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
International Journal of Geographical Information Science n/a n/a 5.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 5.4
weeks
14.6
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: High quality and profound reviews by knowledgeable experts. Their very careful comments took some time to process but they were all correct and they have substantially improved the quality of the manuscript. The editor was quite professional and quick with notifications and replies to my queries.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 6.5
weeks
15.2
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Based on my experience, IJGIS journal is very good and fast in giving the initial decision of the first round of review, whether the article is accepted or not. This is very important. In addition, the received comments where scientifically valid and important in order to improve the article. The duration for second round of revision was also acceptable. I personally believe this journal is one of the bests in the domain of GIS.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 10.9
weeks
22.9
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: In-depth reviews and a relatively fast process. Great communication from the editor.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 7.0
weeks
7.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Efficient process with reasonable reviews that have improved the paper.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 7.0
weeks
7.0
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Motivation: The paper was rejected in its present form after significant criticism from the reviewers. The reviewers were however very thorough and provided very useful feedback. The journal also welcomed a new submission on the topic once all the issues were solved.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12.3
weeks
19.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The paper was accepted after two rounds of reviews. The reviews were thorough and very good. The communication with the editor was excellent.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 7.0
weeks
13.3
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Excellent process with amazingly thorough reviews. Very impressed.