Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
46.0 weeks
46.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2019
Motivation:
Almost a year passed away from the initial submission and the two reviewers developed a superficial revision of the paper in 6/7 sentences. Furthermore, unfortunately and somehow they were contradictory. For instance, the 1st reviewer argue that "Professional native-speaker proofreading required!", instead the 2nd one pointed out that "Again, congratulations for the writing and structure of the paper. It is clear and well-done".