Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
46.1 weeks
46.1 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
This Journal has worst review system. The handling time is too long. The reviewers and editors are not helpful at all.
38.9 weeks
39.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2022
21.9 weeks
34.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
14.6 weeks
14.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
Among three reviewers two reviewers were positive in their knowledge and the third reviewer mentioned that literature review was not enough for publishing in this journal. They also mentioned typo errors and that was not visible for other two reviewers and it has not mentioned clearly what kind of typo error.
Though two reviewers submitted positive comment but based on one negative review that too literature content the manuscript was rejected.
Though two reviewers submitted positive comment but based on one negative review that too literature content the manuscript was rejected.
20.9 weeks
20.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
The review process was extremely long. The editor handled the manuscript more than 2 months. Few weeks after I received a mail that all the requiered reviews were complete, and another time I was waiting more than 3 weeks in "ready for decision", which was finally a rejection. The first reviewer explained with arguments its rejection with some comments but the second just limited to say that the paper was not original.
39.1 weeks
41.2 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
The impression left on me by this review process was mixed. The duration between the first submission and the first reviews was extremely long (9 months) but, once I sent the revisions, the paper was accepted two weeks after, which was a pleasant surprise. Concerning the quality of the reviews, it was also mixed : one of them was very good, bringing welcome insights, another focused only on form and had nothing of substance to contribute but was a fair assessment, while the last one read like a rant written by someone who was not familiar with the subject at hand.