Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.3 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
The paper was handled properly without much delay. I received three reviewer reports; they helped me improve the work towards final acceptance. The production process was smooth and fast.
13.1 weeks
13.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Drawn back
2016
Motivation:
The reviewers were timely, but only one reviewer provided feedback, and this person apparently knew very little about the topic. The editor asked for a revision, but provided no specific suggestions about how to improve the MS. In total, the editor and the reviewer provided 9 sentences of "feedback."
65.1 weeks
80.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2012
60.8 weeks
60.8 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2012