Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.9 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
2016
Motivation: Though the review process was not exceptionally quick, and I had to follow up with the editor about 6 weeks after the submission, I thought the review process was fair, and the editors always promptly responded to my queries. I thought the editorial process was very speedy and efficient.