Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
41.7 weeks
41.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
The review process was particularly slow (it was a special issue for the journal) and it was nearly impossible to contact the person in charge of our paper. The user interface is also quite unfriendly and the important emails are exclusively send to the corresponding author without cc to other authors involved (which can cause issues and further delays if the corresponding author is sick or absent).
On the positive side, we received high quality reviews that truly helped improving the scientific and editorial quality of the work.
On the positive side, we received high quality reviews that truly helped improving the scientific and editorial quality of the work.
n/a
n/a
21 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013