Reviews for "International Journal of Comparative Sociology"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
International Journal of Comparative Sociology | 9.7 weeks |
9.7 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Rejected |
Motivation: My coauthor and I felt stuck with this project so we sent it off to get some critical feedback. I was worried about a desk reject but the editor sent it out to external reviewers. There were two reviewers who suggested a denial and the other two suggested an R&R with major revisions. The feedback included suggestions for additional data and clarifying theoretical frameworks. The editor was an expert on the topic I was writing on, so he gave us a thorough feedback in his letter too. He suggested a denial, but I was not surprised by the result. | |||||||
International Journal of Comparative Sociology | 14.4 weeks |
14.4 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The process was pretty fast. However, the sent work received an unconventional number of revisions. Specifically, 4 reviewers did the work. Their decisions were: "minor revision", two "major revision" and one "reject". The editor decided to reject the paper without the possibility to dialogue with the reviewers or address any problem of the paper. | |||||||
International Journal of Comparative Sociology | 26.0 weeks |
47.1 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |