Reviews for "International Journal of Communication"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
International Journal of Communication | 13.1 weeks |
20.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 2 (moderate) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Rejecting a paper after a revision because the contribution to the filed is not sufficient is very disappointing. Why did you ask for a revision indeed? | |||||||
International Journal of Communication | 14.5 weeks |
14.5 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: It took 14 weeks to get a rejection, which is not as bad as some journals. However, it seems a bit lengthy given that the rejections were not extremely deep. The criticisms were not petty for the most part, but they had completely overridden the positive reviewer's feedback. | |||||||
International Journal of Communication | 4.9 weeks |
9.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |