Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
10.6 weeks
11.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2020
Motivation: The entire process was smooth, the reviewer comments were helpful, and I feel the manuscript was greatly improved as a result of the reviewer comments.
7.3 weeks
9.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
1
1
Rejected
2018
Motivation: second round rejection without much of a reason given; quick handling, but one out of the three reviews in the first round was so poor that the editors should have noticed.
12.7 weeks
13.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
2017
Motivation: Initial reviews took a while, but communication with editorial team was very good and they kept me informed of progress. Most of the reviewer comments were helpful and of high quality.
8.7 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2013