Reviews for "International and Comparative Law Quarterly"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
International and Comparative Law Quarterly 43.4
n/a 2 1
Motivation: The review took over 10 months, and several unreturned emails checking on the status of the review. After this wait, one review was one paragraph long and simply stated the abstract should be "jazzed up". The other review was two paragraphs without much substance. For a top journal, I was disappointed in the length of review, quality of review and lack of communication.
International and Comparative Law Quarterly n/a n/a 121.6
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The review process appeared to be rather unprofessional. The response only came after I asked about the status of the review process. There were no reasons given for the rejection.