Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
14.0 weeks
15.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: The first round of reviews took a bit of time, but the feedback from all three reviewers as well as the editor was of high quality - thorough and helpful. Furthermore, the publication process after the paper was accepted was very efficient.