Reviews for "Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies n/a n/a 8.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Desk reject with motivation "does not fit within the scope of the journal". No further comments as to why it was out of scope. The paper was 1000% within the scope of the journal so basically the editor did not like it but did not want to bother making a sensible explanation.

It's the second time this exact same thing happened with this journal. Polite request for clarifications went unanswered.

Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 47.6
weeks
52.7
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 21.7
weeks
21.8
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The only issue is that the reviewer's comments (while kinda insightful) focused on a really small part of the paper itself, without addressing the general idea. Overall, however, I am satisfied with the review process.