|Journal title||Average duration||Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
|(click to go to journal page)||1st rev. rnd||Tot. handling||Im. rejection||Number||Quality||Overall rating||Outcome|
|Information Technology and People||n/a||n/a||55.0
|Motivation: Our paper covered a phenomenon within their aims and scope. They published papers in the relevant phenomenon before as well, but they still desk-reject on the ground of unfit aims and scope. Entirely ungrounded reasons for desk-rejection. And obviously, it took too much time for a desk-rejection. They have 4 EICs, but they do not have particularly more submissions than other journals in similar tier.
When the EICs earn a wage from the publisher, please do their job.