Reviews for "Information and Management"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Information and Management 9.9
weeks
9.9
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Comments are fair but I wish the reviewer can be more constructive by offering more specific comments.
Information and Management 17.9
weeks
31.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Motivation: Although the decision was not what we wanted, the review process was quite high quality. The reviewers and AE were quite knowledgeable on the topic. Although we had a philosophical divergence with one of the reviewers, the AE supported us on that point and so did not let that be a deciding factor. The reviews were received in average time for journals in our field. Considering that the eventual decision was a rejection, I'm glad it did not drag for more than two rounds--the journal gave us a fair attempt to try to retell our story. Overall, I consider this a good-quality process for a rejection outcome.
Information and Management 17.3
weeks
26.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted