Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.9 weeks
12.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
2
3
Rejected
2025
Motivation: The paper was rejected following the opinion of just one reviewer, as no reviewer 2 provided no report. The issue of rejection was endogeneity. That was quite fair, but the reviewer comments were definitely not constructive.
30.6 weeks
30.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
1
1
Rejected
2020
73.8 weeks
73.8 weeks
n/a
2 reports
0
0
Rejected
2012
Motivation: The editor at this journal is a disgrace to journal editors. His tenure should be terminated forthwith. The editor did not respond to any form of contact (email, telephone calls, etc.) as we tried to find out what had happened to our manuscript after well over a year of waiting for a response.