Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
21.6 weeks
54.9 weeks
n/a
6 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
The reviewers' comments were perfect.
The reviewing process took a long time. For my paper, this process was almost 15 months from the submitting paper for the first time until the paper has been accepted.
The reviewing process took a long time. For my paper, this process was almost 15 months from the submitting paper for the first time until the paper has been accepted.
14.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
It seems the reasons provided for rejection could be immediately conveyed by the editor. The scientific advices provided after that long review period was not worth waiting. I think every author expects that she/he learns something from a rejection especially after several months of waiting.